Tag Archive for 'search-matters'

Microsoft to buy Yahoo: Redux. Ad Nauseam.

Word on the street is that, in light of their latest loss to Google over Double Click and the new Google Apps (MS Office killer) and a possible Google OS beta to be released soon, Redmond is back in talks with Yahoo about a possible merger; even though the business advantages to this merger appear to be much weaker than at this time last year.

While Microsoft and Yahoo have held informal deal talks over the years, the latest approach signals an urgency on Microsoft’s part that has up until now been lacking, the newspaper said, citing sources.

The approach follows an offer Microsoft made to acquire Yahoo a few months ago, which Yahoo spurned… (source: Forbes)

Although these merger discussions are almost as elusive as el chupacabra, and are in no way confirmed by either party, many in the industry think that Yahoo, who was once very interested, may be getting cold feet [read:Hard to get?].

“They’re getting tired of being left at the altar,” said one banking source who has recently had talks with Microsoft. “They now seem more willing to extend themselves via a transaction to get into the game.” (source: NY Post)

This time however, Microsoft has pulled in some financial heavy weights to broker the reportedly 50 Billion dollar deal. That’s Billion with capital B.

The [NY Post] report values Yahoo! at $50 billion; the interest by Microsoft is said to be serious to the point that world renowned bankers Goldman Sachs are advising Microsoft on the deal.

If the deal comes to fruition, the takeover would be one of the largest corporate takeovers in American corporate history, and likely the largest ever in the Tech sector. (source: TechCrunch)

That last point begs the questions: how will this affect search and how will this impact the user? Google has 65% market share on search and Yahoo is a distant second with Microsoft steadily losing share, so a) how will this benefit Yahoo (aside from wheelbarrows full of cash) and b) if Yahoo is on the blocks, why wouldn’t Google be after them instead?

So is this real? Will there be a MicroHoo or an MS-Yahoo!? (or even a Yahoogle?) Well, the social networking community seems to think so. It’s page one in Digg as of this writing and Tech Crunch reports that Yahoo stock is up 18% as of this morning.

And all this comes on the heels of Yahoo CEO Terry Semel’s comments last year (when it would have made more sense for Yahoo to join Microsoft, before Microsoft developed its own ad program).

“My impartial advice to Microsoft is that you have no chance,” Mr Semel said. “The search business has been formed.” (source: Search Engine Land)

Whatever happens, the search landscape will be different, which is probably a good thing for the user and a bad thing for the SEM’s trying to keep up. What do you think?

Click Fraud: Are Your Campaigns Safe?

Since the advent of paid search engine marketing, click fraud has been a growing area of concern for search engine marketers. Estimates of the scope of click fraud vary from 10% to 35% of all click activity. If not detected, click fraud can rob your company of both your marketing dollars and your sales. Are your campaigns safe? This article provides some tips on how to detect click fraud in your campaigns and some guidance on what to do if you find it.

Continue reading ‘Click Fraud: Are Your Campaigns Safe?’

Search Matters Weekly Search Links 4/25/2007

Blogs, social networks and personalized search are all making headlines this week. All this fancy pants social media and uppity blog talk gets me cranky. I remember a time when you didn’t have to worry about RSS food and XML whatsits and tag storms, or whatever. You just built a static website with a crap interface and impossible navigation, launched it to the web and never touched it again because the IT guy who quit was the only one with the FTP password. Ah, the good ole days.

  • Power to the people. Will Blogs be the death of news? (SEW Blog)
  • J&J to give 120,000 employees personal blogs? I’m sorry I can’t hear you because the hell freezing over is so loud. (Pharma Marketing Blog)
  • MySpace’s new Digg/Netscape/Reddit/American Idol clone is a few telomeres shy of a double helix. (SEOmoz)
  • Google’s web search history in personalized results is ruining the party for everyone. And I thought that my name was #1 in Google because I’m. Just. That. Awesome. Damn. (Gord)
  • Matt Cutts not convincing me one single bit. (Matt Cutts)
  • I think I know your password, dummy. Top 10 most frequently used (and hacked) passwords. Guess what? Password is #1. Damn. (Threadwatch)

SEM Has Become Mainstream

I’m not sure exactly when it happened but it happened.  Search engine marketing has become mainstream.  Businesses of all sizes no longer debate whether or not they need to do search engine marketing, the debate has become: “Do we do it in-house or do we hire an experienced SEM agency.”  

Not long ago, many businesses who were jumping on the SEM band wagon decided the SEO component of SEM required technical expertise that they did not have internally, so it was a fairly easy decision to farm that piece out to an experienced SEO firm.   Conversely, many companies felt they could manage the paid search component in-house since it was a fairly straightforward process in that you could completely control your rankings simply by outbidding your competitors. 

The SEM world is now a very different place.  If you are considering the option of managing your campaign in-house, make sure you know what you are getting into.  Mistakes will cost you in terms of rankings and revenue, and you can quickly burn through your SEM budget.

On the organic side of SEM, gone are the days of doorway pages, invisible text, and other black hat short cuts to success.  Competition for the top spots is stronger than ever and the search engines have strict rules about how you can optimize your site to improve rankings.

Optimizing your paid search engine marketing campaign has also become very sophisticated.   Paid search engine marketers need to have in depth knowledge of the search engine tools and features.   The days of controlling your ranking based solely on your bid are over.  Nowadays, your quality score is at least as important as your bids.   Keyphrase relevancy, click-through rate, ad quality, landing page quality, and site quality are all factors that impact your ranking and the amount you pay per click.   It may not be rocket science but its getting there.   Furthermore each search engine has its own unique algorithm for ranking paid search ads, unique rules for writing ads, different match type options, different methods for handling plurals and mis-spellings, different demographics and psychographics, and well you get the idea.  Its not as easy as it used to be.  And oh yeah, the rules and tools are constantly changing.  

Just remember, at the end of the day it all comes down to your return on investment.  Good search engine marketing not only requires good technical and marketing skills, it requires good business skills.  Do you have what it takes?






RSS Entries and RSS Comments